He always wanted to find the truth in all the characters, and in every single performance. The word that I connect most with David Yates is truth. This is the one that has a great sense of realism to it. It’s the film, certainly, that I’m most proud of, and I think we all had a wonderful time working with David.Įmma Watson: The thing about David that I feel is that this is the most genuine of all the films. RT-UK: How did working with David Yates inform the experience?ĭR: I think what David managed to do, which is fantastic, is that he took the charm of the films that Chris made and the visual flair of everything that Alfonso did, and the thoroughly bombastic, British nature of Mike Newell’s fourth film, and he’s added his own sense of grit and realism to it that perhaps wasn’t there before.
I talked to Jo Rowling about that and she just said, well, frankly, if people say they don’t understand why Harry is angry in the book then they don’t understand what he’s been through in the past five years he has a right to be angry.īut I think you’re right, for me it was possibly just as interesting to play the more reflective side of the anger and where it comes from the loneliness, and feeling misunderstood by everyone, rather than the out-and-out shouting that people might have interpreted was what was in the book. RT-UK: Daniel Harry gets angry in this film, did it make him more challenging to play without alienating the audience and making him unsympathetic?ĭaniel Radcliffe: Very good question that was the overwhelming response to this book, a lot of people said that they didn’t like Harry because they disliked how angry he was.
0 kommentar(er)
